HARNESS ATLASAn Astra × QZ project ↗
← THE CORPUS

RESEARCH NOTE 04 / 2022

ReAct

ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, Yuan Cao

arXiv:2210.03629v3 · submitted 2022-10-06

Corpus interpretation

The idea in one paragraph.

Interleaving reasoning traces with environment actions lets each correct the other - thinking plans the next action, and observations correct the thinking.

THE MACHINERY

01

Thought-Action-Observation loop

Alternate free-form reasoning with a tool call and its observation.

02

Acting as grounding

Retrieved observations correct hallucinated reasoning mid-trajectory.

What the paper reports.

Findings are reproduced as concise corpus summaries, with their original confidence labels. They are not independent replications.

Paper reports

On ALFWorld and WebShop, outperforms imitation and reinforcement learning methods by an absolute success rate of 34% and 10% respectively, while prompted with only one or two examples.

Inspect a source excerpt
outperforms imitation and reinforcement learning methods by an absolute success rate of 34% and 10% respectively, while being prompted with…
Read the passage in context on arXiv ↗
Corpus interpretation

Reasoning alone hallucinates; acting alone cannot plan. The combination beats either.

LIMITATIONS / CORPUS READING

Where to keep your judgement.

  • The loop is fixed by the prompt; nothing accumulates between episodes.
  • No verifier - the trajectory ends when the model says it is done.
Atlas interpretation

Why it belongs in this atlas.

The canonical agent loop, and still the default shape of almost every harness. Note what it lacks: no memory across runs, no verification, no budget the agent can reason about.

Read the connections.